BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Wood v Hary Baird. [1696] Mor 4860 (5 June 1696)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Mor1204860-003.html
Cite as: [1696] Mor 4860

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1696] Mor 4860      

Subject_1 FRAUD.
Subject_2 SECT. I.

Fraudulent Concealment.

James Wood
v.
Hary Baird

Date: 5 June 1696
Case No. No 3.

Money offered at the current rate, after private knowledge of an act of Parliament lessening its value, found to be fraudulent.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Wood being debtor to Baird in a sum, and hearing that on the 2d of June current, the Privy Council had by an act cried down the 40 shilling pieces from 44, (at which they had passed before) to their old standard of 40 pence; he that same night went and offered payment of the whole sum to his creditor in 40 shilling pieces; and he refusing to take them at their former rate, he took instruments on his offer, and gave in a bill of suspension, alleging he ought to be ordained to take them at the rate of 44, in regard the act was not proclaimed at the market-cross, (which is the only thing that puts the lieges in mala fide,) till the next day after his offer, and before proclamation the act was not obligatory nor binding.—— The Lords considered the design of promulgating these acts was to certiorate the lieges; so if they knew before that public intimation, that was sufficient to make his offer fraudulent; and so found the creditor was not bound to accept of his private knowledge and fraudulent design. Some urged his oath might be taken if he knew that the act was passed before his offer; but the Lords thought that needless, because his bill of suspension seemed to acknowledge as much.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 332. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 718.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Mor1204860-003.html