BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Watson v Milin. [1696] Mor 14720 (18 November 1696)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Mor3314720-126.html Cite as:
[1696] Mor 14720
Subject_1 SOLIDUM ET PRO RATA. Subject_2 SECT. XX.
Quorum of Judges. - Arbiters. - Auditors. - Trustees.
Watson v. Milin
Date: 18 November 1696 Case No. No. 126.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A decreet-arbitral was found null, for this reason, That it was referred to four arbiters, (each party having named two) who, in case of discrepancy, were to choose an oversman, and yet the decret was given only by two, who took on them to nominate an oversman, the other two dissenting, although one of these two was the pursuer's own arbiter.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 387.
*** This case is No. 47. p. 648. voce Arbitration.
