BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Campbell of Ormsay v The Laird of Macnaughtan. [1699] 1 Brn 601 (8 December 1669) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1699/Brn010601-1516.html Cite as: [1699] 1 Brn 601 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1699] 1 Brn 601
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR PETER WEDDERBURN, LORD GOSFORD.
Date: Campbell of Ormsay
v.
The Laird of Macnaughtan
8 December 1669 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a spuilyie, pursued at Ormsay's instance against this Macnaughtan, as heir
to his father, which was alleged to have been committed in anno 1645 there was a Defence proponed upon the Act of Indemnity; and that the defender offered to prove, that his father, the time of the alleged spuilyie, was an officer of the army, under the late Marquis of Argyle. It was replied, That the pursuer offered him to prove, that the defender's father did apply the same to his own use and behoof. The Lords, notwithstanding, sustained the defence; in respect that never any pursuit was intented against the defender's father or himself, for the space of twenty-seven years: and found, that it would be of a dangerous preparative to sustain such a pursuit, after so long a time; it being impossible for the defender to condescend and debate upon the way and manner how such goods were employed; and that it was enough to offer to prove, that he was a standing officer for the time, and did take away the goods libelled, by soldiers under his command.
Page 86.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting