BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Crawford v Alexander Bruce. [1699] Mor 649 (4 January 1699)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1699/Mor0200649-048.html
Cite as: [1699] Mor 649

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1699] Mor 649      

Subject_1 ARBITRATION.
Subject_2 Formalities of the Deed of Submission and Decree-Arbitral.

Earl of Crawford
v.
Alexander Bruce

Date: 4 January 1699
Case No. No 48.

Found in conformity with No 42. p. 645.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Arbruchall reported the Earl of Crawford and Alexander Bruce, son to Broomhall. It was a reduction of a decreet-arbitral as subscribed of a false date, in so far as it was not signed till after the day to which the submission was confined was elapsed, yet it is made of an ante-date.—Answered, Esto, That were true, yet primordium habet veritatis ; for the minute, which is the warrant, was truly subscribed by the arbitrators within the time prefixed.——The Lords found the minute being subscribed within the time, was sufficient, though extended thereafter, providing there was no more in the extension than in the minute, and the date at the head of the minute must be presumed to be the date of the subscription, unless it were redargued; for omnia præsumuntur alemniter acta, et interpretatio sumenda ut actus valeat. See 27th March 1633 Forrester contra Gourlay, No. 42. p. 645. It was here also debated, but not determined, whether a decreet-arbitral opened upon a nullity, falls in toto, or be like an articulatus libellus only quoadthat article, as is provided for securities of decreets in foro by the late regulations in 1695; and though decreets-arbitral are there exempted from being reduced upon iniquity, but only upon corruption and falshood, yet if that will exclude nullities.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 51. Fount. v. 2. p. 31.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1699/Mor0200649-048.html