BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Elisabeth Strachan v Bailie Nairn. [1706] 4 Brn 655 (30 July 1706)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1706/Brn040655-0150.html
Cite as: [1706] 4 Brn 655

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1706] 4 Brn 655      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Subject_2 I sat in the Outer-House this week.

Elisabeth Strachan
v.
Bailie Nairn

Date: 30 July 1706

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Strachan against Nairn. Complaints being made to Bailie Nairn in Dalkeith, that one Elisabeth Strachan, dwelling there, was a common resetter of thieves, and stolen goods, and particularly of one Mary Cockburn, a notour thief, there is a process raised against her at the fiscal's instance; and, on probation, she is incarcerated, and her goods seized on: whereupon she raises a process before the Lords, against the said Bailie, for wrongous imprisonment, and so much per diem, conform to the Act of Parliament 1700, and likewise for spuilyie of her goods.

Alleged,—She, being attacked and convicted for reset of theft, was not in the terms of the said Act, which related mainly to state crimes, and excepted thefts, as to which the procedure was allowed to be the same as it had been formerly; and it was proven she was a seducer of servants and children to pilfer and steal, and a resetter of such persons. And, as to the spuilyie, it was done by virtue of a decreet and authore pratore, and so could never be a spuilyie.

Answered,—He could never incarcerate her till he first subscribed a warrant, condescending on the causes of her imprisonment, and give her a double of it; none of which was done. And her receiving Mary Cockburn to lodge in her house was no crime, not being conscious to her dishonesty, neither is it proven. And though his seizing on my goods might not be a spuilyie, yet there is ground enough for having her goods restored, and her damages refunded: which is small enough reparation for the injury done her good name and fortune.

The Lords found her not in the case of the late Act of Parliament 1700, anent wrongous imprisonment; and found no spuilyie; and therefore assoilyied from both the branches of the libel.

Vol. II. Page 347.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1706/Brn040655-0150.html