BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Sir James Elphinston v Lord Salton. [1708] 4 Brn 707 (25 June 1708)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1708/Brn040707-0205.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL. Subject_2 I sat in the Outer-House this week.
Sir James Elphinston v. Lord Salton
Date: 25 June 1708
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In 1692 Lord Salton signs a bond, blank in the creditor's name, for 1000 merks, wherein Mr John Buchan was principal, and my Lord cautioner, to be a fund of credit for Mr Buchan to raise the money; but he, not having use for it then, kept it beside him till the year 1701; and being debtor to Sir James Elphinston, he gives him this bond in part payment; whereupon Sir James charging my Lord, he suspends, and raises a process of exhibition and delivery of the bond, on this ground, That it lay many years in the debtor Mr Buchan's hand, after the term of payment, not made use of, and so must be reputed instrumentum apud debitorem repertum, and consequently solutum and extinct; and Mr Buchan, by his letter and declaration, denies that ever he delivered it to Sir James; but when his house was burnt, in the Meal-market, in February 1700, he sent some bundles of his papers to Sir James's chamber, and it seems this has been amongst them: and though this bond is prior to the Act of Parliament in 1696, discharging blank-bonds, yet, its delivery being posterior to that act, it will fall, under the prohibition of that act, to be null.
Answered,—Whatever has been Mr Buchan's part in this cause, Sir James Elphinston's acquisition of it is both honest and fair; and, to convel Mr Buchan's declaration, he produces a fitted account betwixt them, wherein Mr Buchan declares, that he had given him this bond in part payment of his debt; and the Act 1696, discharging blank-bonds, has no retrospect, and so concerns not this case: and the brocard of a writ apud debitorem were good, if my Lord could instruct that this bond had been ever out of Mr Buchan's hand, before its delivery to Sir James; for then it could not be kept up to afford a fund of credit oftener than once.
The question was stated,—Repel my Lord Salton's defence, or appoint Sir James to depone on the time and manner of his receiving it, and exhibit, reserving against delivery? And the Lords being equally split, it carried, by the President's vote, that he should depone before answer.
