BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Thomas Law, Son to William Law Taylor in Jedburgh v Thomas Turnbull of Firth. [1710] Mor 7156 (24 November 1710)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Mor1707156-031.html Cite as:
[1710] Mor 7156
Interdicter may not be auctor in rem suam. - Manner of adhibiting the Interdicter's consent. - Effect of the Death of the Interdicter.
Thomas Law, Son to William Law Taylor in Jedburgh v. Thomas Turnbull of Firth
Date: 24 November 1710 Case No. No 31.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the action at the instance of Thomas Law, against Thomas Turnbull, as representing his father, for payment of a bond granted by him to the pursuer's father; the Lords were clearly of opinion, that a bond granted by an interdicted person without consent of his interdictors, could not be supported as valid by their subscribing witnesses to it.
