BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of March v The Earl of Leven. [1710] Mor 15904 (28 June 1710) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Mor3615904-041.html Cite as: [1710] Mor 15904 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1710] Mor 15904
Subject_1 TERM LEGAL AND CONVENTIONAL.
Date: Earl of March
v.
The Earl of Leven
28 June 1710
Case No.No. 41.
The Governor of a garrison whose commission from the Sovereign was recalled after Whit-sunday, entitled to half of that year's rent, though payable in victual only betwixt Yule and Candlemas thereafter, and the succeeding Governor was expressly assigned in his commission to that whole year's rent.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The deceased Earl of March having procured from the Queen a commission under the Great Seal, to be Governor of the Castle of Edinburgh, durante beneplacito, dated December 31, 1702, and sealed the 14th January, 1703 ; and having served in that station till after Whitsunday 1704; the present Earl, as deriving right from his father, pursued the Earl of Leven, the succeeding governor, for payment of the first half year's victual rent, payable to the Governor of the Castle for the crop 1704, that had been uplifted by the defender.
Answered for the defender : The pursuer hath no right to any part of the crop 1704, in respect the same was payable only betwixt Yule and Candlemas thereafter, and his father's commission was revoked long before, and a new one granted to the Earl of Leven, assigning expressly to him the whole Castle rents for the crop 1704.
Replied for the pursuer: The Queen's gift to the defender is only to be understood civiliter, that he should have the crop 1704, from the time he began to be Governor; and the recalling the Earl of March's commission cannot wrong him of the pay and perquisites due for his service. It is notour, that military commissioned officers are paid to the day of their death, or deprivation; yea, crops of victual are divided according to the interest of parties between the heir and executor; so ministers serving the cure after Whitsunday, or life-renters. surviving that term, have unquestionable right to half a year's stipend or life-rent.
Duplied for the defender: The rents being only assigned to the Governor for his service, as payable betwixt Yule and Candlemas; and a power reserved to recal the assignation at pleasure any time before the rent is due, i. e. before the term of payment; no part of the rent is due, unless the Governor serve till the term of payment, as is clear from a decision in the parallel case, June 24, 1630, Scrimzeour against Dean-Miln, No. 12. p. 15881.
The Lords preferred the Earl of March to the half of the crop 1704.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting