BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Nisbet of Dirleton v Marion Johnston, Relict of Alexander Wood. [1711] Mor 11528 (26 July 1711) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1711/Mor2711528-205.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION V. Payment being made, who understood to have advanced the Money.
Date: William Nisbet of Dirleton
v.
Marion Johnston, Relict of Alexander Wood
26 July 1711
Case No.No 205.
Discharges taka by a tenant, of debts owing by his master to a third person, were not allowed to he tenant in his accourus, in respect the discharges bore that the money was received from the master himself, although the tenant produced with the discharges an ex post facto declaration under the creditor's hand, that he was paid by the tenants.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the compt and reckoning at the instance of Dirleton against Marion Johnston, as representing Jasper Johnston of Warieston, her father, who had been tacksman of some lands belonging to the Laird of Craigintinny, the pursuer's father; the defender craved allowance of two debts she alleged were paid by her father for Craigintinny to the Laird of Balmadies, conform to two discharges produced by the defender, the Lords refused to allow this article, in respect the discharges bore, that the money was received from Craigintinny himself; albeit the defender produced a declaration under Balmadie's hand ex post facto, that he received the money from Jasper Johnston, and alleged. That the taking the discharges in Craigintinny's name is no argument that the payments were made by him, seeing, 1mo, The discharges remained in the custody
of Jasper Johnston, who had it in his power to have retired them, and taken in lieu thereof an assignation from the creditor; which he scrupled as little to grant, as the declaration aforesaid; 2do, Tenants usually take discharges of cesses, ministers' stipends, or the like, in their master's name; and yet having these in their custody, never fail to get allowance of the same as so much paid of their rent; so that Craigintinny's name has been inserted only for the more easy expediting of the account betwixt him and Jasper his tacksman.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting