BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Aiton of Kinnaldie v Scot. [1711] Mor 16331 (18 January 1711) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1711/Mor3716331-253.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 TUTOR - CURATOR - PUPIL.
Date: Aiton of Kinnaldie
v.
Scot
18 January 1711
Case No.No. 253.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A tutor having submitted his pupil's claim, and the pupil being charged upon the decree-arbitral, the Lords had no occasion to determine the general point, If tutors might submit, because they found the decree-arbitral could not afford a summary charge against his pupil, but only an ordinary action; but they declared, that they would decern the pupil to implement, unless he could instruct evident lesion.
*** This case is No. 22. p. 14997. voce Summary diligence.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting