BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Theodore Morison of Bognie v The Earl of Leven. [1713] Mor 5181 (20 February 1713) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1713/Mor1305181-016.html Cite as: [1713] Mor 5181 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1713] Mor 5181
Subject_1 GROUNDS and WARRANTS.
Subject_2 SECT. II. After twenty years, warrants need not be produced.
Date: Theodore Morison of Bognie
v.
The Earl of Leven
20 February 1713
Case No.No 16.
In a reduction of a decree of constitution against a person charged in general to enter heir, certification against the general charge and executions thereof, was refused after twenty years.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the reduction and improbation at the instance of Bognie against the Earl of Leven, for sweeping away all rights affecting the estate of Frendraught; the Lords, upon a report made by the Lord Arniston, found, 1mo, That a decreet of apprising recovered from a third party, and produced ad modum probationis in a decreet of constitution, against one as charged to enter heir in general, was not to be considered as a ground and warrant of the decreet; so that in a reduction and improbation of the decreet of constitution, and an adjudication following thereon, the adjudger was not bound to produce that apprising which was the right of a third party, in which the adjudger had no interest; and therefore the Lords refused to grant certification against the decrect of apprising. 2do, The Lords refused to grant certification against a general charge to enter heir, with the executions thereof after 20 years, conform to the decision, Brown contra Hume, No 7. p. 5169; as after so long time there is no necessity of producing a summons of adjudication with the executions thereof.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting