BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Sophia and Mary Shearers v George Fleming and Janet Ker his Spouse. [1714] Mor 6794 (19 November 1714)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1714/Mor1606794-004.html Cite as:
[1714] Mor 6794
Subject_1 INDEFINITE INTROMISSION. Subject_2 SECT. I.
Applicable in duriorem sortem.
Sophia and Mary Shearers v. George Fleming and Janet Ker his Spouse
Date: 19 November 1714 Case No. No 4.
In a competition betwixt real prior creditors of a defunct, and the second husband of a relict, life rentrix of houses, who was in possession, and who had adjudged for expenses of repairs allowed to him by a decree of the Dean of Guild, it was found, that his intromissions must be imputed in the first place in satisfaction of the decree, and adjudication following upon it.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
James Hodge having granted heritable securities upon some houses in Edinburgh, to some of his creditors, to which his wife expressly consented; after his decease, George Fleming marries the said relict and liferentrix, and enters to possession by virtue of her liferent-infeftment; and, further, having applied to the Dean of Guild for a visit, he obtains from him a report, that the houses were become ruinous; and, in consequence thereof, a warrant to repair; and, after reparation, a decreet of the Dean of Guild court for the expenses, whereupon he adjudges. Thereafter the pursuers, Shearers, raise a process of mails and duties against him, and the other possessors.
Alleged for Fleming, 1mo, That he having entered to the possession by virtue of his wife's liferent-infeftment, was bonæ fidei possessor, qui facit fructus perceptos et consumptos irrevocabiliter suos.
Answered for the pursuers, That his wife having consented to their right, they were preferable to him.
Replied, That however the pursuers might be preferred to the rents in time coming, yet absolvitor from bygones, in respect of the wife's liferent-infeftment, and his bona fides, which could not be interrupted before production of the pursuer's infeftment, to which the wife is a consenter. 2do, Et separatim, he ought to be preferred in time coming, by virtue of the Dean of Guild's decreet and adjudication thereon; because the subject was preserved by the foresaid reparations.
Duplied, That he knowing the reparations were a privileged debt, to which all creditors must yield, was in pessima fide to impute his intromissions to the liferent infeftment in the first place.
The Lords found, that Mr Fleming's intromissions are imputable in satisfaction and payment of the sums due for reparations contained in the Dean of Guild's decreet, and adjudication following thereon.
Act. Spottiswood.Alt. Fleming.Clerk, Gibson.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 459. Bruce, v. 1. No 7. p. 11.
