BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Anna Helena Edmonston v James Edmonston of Broick. [1714] Mor 10990 (15 January 1714) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1714/Mor2610990-188.html Cite as: [1714] Mor 10990 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1714] Mor 10990
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV. Vicennial Prescription of Retours, and of Holograph Writs.
Date: Anna Helena Edmonston
v.
James Edmonston of Broick
15 January 1714
Case No.No 188.
Found the reverse of Hamilton against Hamilton, No 186. p. 10986.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action at the instance of Anna Helena Edmonston against James Edmonston, for payment of a holograph bond granted by the defender's father to the pursuer's father in anno 1665, the Lords found, 1mo, That the said holograph bond was not liable to the prescription of 20 years, introduced by the act 9th Parl. 1669, which extends only to holograph writs made after that startute 2do, They found that inhibition used, the bond is a sufficient document to interrupt prescription.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting