BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Town of Aberdeen v Robert Martin of Burnbrae. [1714] Mor 16421 (29 January 1714) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1714/Mor3716421-027.html Cite as: [1714] Mor 16421 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1714] Mor 16421
Subject_1 USURY.
Date: The Town of Aberdeen
v.
Robert Martin of Burnbrae
29 January 1714
Case No.No. 27.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the discussing of the suspension of a charge at the instance of the Town of Aberdeen against Robert Martin, for payment of L. 1000, and bygone annual-rents thereof contained in a bond granted by the said Robert Martin to the Dean of Guild of the said burgh; the Lords found usury not incurred by the granting one discharge for a year's annual-rent of the said L. 1000 from Lammas 1709, to Lammas 1710, and another discharge of annual-rent thereof from Whitsunday 1710, till Whitsunday 1712; for the granting of two discharges for one year's or term's annual-rent by mistake, doth not oblige the discharger to impute the additional sum received in payment of the principal, whereas usury is the taking wittingly more annual-rent for one year or term than law doth allow.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting