BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Donald of Bornaskittag v M'Leod of Hammer. [1726] Mor 3765 (11 January 1726) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1726/Mor0903765-111.html Cite as: [1726] Mor 3765 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1726] Mor 3765
Subject_1 EXECUTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV. The execution must specify the Names and Designations of the Parties, Dwelling-houses, &c.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Execution by leaving a Copy.
Date: M'Donald of Bornaskittag
v.
M'Leod of Hammer
11 January 1726
Case No.No 111.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A defender insisting in a no-process, because the copy signed and delivered to him by the messenger was disconform to the summons, it was answered, that the execution must bear faith, mentioning the delivery of a just copy, until it be improved; nor is the truth of the execution redargued by the lame copy produced, which may have been made up ex post facto in concert with the messenger, in order to cast the process.––––– The Lords repelled the objection. See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting