BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Aikenhead v Russel. [1727] Mor 5344 (6 July 1727)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1727/Mor1305344-011.html Cite as:
[1727] Mor 5344
An heir cum beneficio who had improved the estate, was made to account at the improved value.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
An heir entering cum beneficio inventarii to an estate over-burdened with debt, but having afterwards, by industry, considerably improved the same, disponed a part for payment of a preferable creditor, more than equivalent to the original value of the inventory. Being thereafter attacked by other creditors, the question arose, If he must be liable according to the present worth of the subject, or only for what it was at his entry? It was pleaded for the heir, That he was not trustee, but proprietor; that the creditors had no real interest in the subject of the inventory; that the inventory was only designed as a method to fix a certain value beyond which the heir should not be liable; and accordingly, that if at any time the heir made this value furthcoming to the creditors he was at liberty to make of the estate what he would. It was added, that were this otherwise, it would put an effectual stop to the industry and improvements of heirs who enter by inventory, since no man will readily plant where another is to reap. The Lords notwithstanding found the heir liable to account according to the present value. See Appendix.
