BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bell v Herdman. [1727] Mor 11039 (14 February 1727) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1727/Mor2611039-234.html Cite as: [1727] Mor 11039 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1727] Mor 11039
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION VII. Septennial Prescription of Cautionary Obligations, by act 5th Parl. 1695.
Subject_3 SECT. III. Effect of Intimation to the Creditor. - Interruption of the Prescription.
Date: Bell
v.
Herdman
14 February 1727
Case No.No 234.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
It was found, that the creditor's private knowledge is not sufficient, but that there must be an intimation by way of instrument, under the hand of a notary, at the time of signing or delivering the bond.—See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting