BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Kenzie v Town of Burntisland. [1728] Mor 11102 (26 December 1728) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1728/Mor2611102-305.html Cite as: [1728] Mor 11102 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1728] Mor 11102
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IX. Triennial Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Triennial Prescription of Accounts, Act 1579. c. 83.
Date: M'Kenzie
v.
Town of Burntisland
26 December 1728
Case No.No 305.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A pension of 40 merks per annum being established by an act of a town-council, in favours of an advocate; in a process for payment, this case was found not to fall under the triennial prescription. See Appendix.
*** A similar decision was pronounced February 1730, Lockhart against Duke of Queensberry; see Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting