BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Kenzie v Town of Burntisland. [1728] Mor 11102 (26 December 1728)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1728/Mor2611102-305.html
Cite as: [1728] Mor 11102

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1728] Mor 11102      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IX.

Triennial Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. IV.

Triennial Prescription of Accounts, Act 1579. c. 83.

M'Kenzie
v.
Town of Burntisland

Date: 26 December 1728
Case No. No 305.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A pension of 40 merks per annum being established by an act of a town-council, in favours of an advocate; in a process for payment, this case was found not to fall under the triennial prescription. See Appendix.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 120.

*** A similar decision was pronounced February 1730, Lockhart against Duke of Queensberry; see Appendix.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1728/Mor2611102-305.html