BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Bank of Scotland v Ramsay. [1729] Mor 16404 (00 July 1729)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1729/Mor3716404-016.html Cite as:
[1729] Mor 16404
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Two feus belonging to different vassals, but lying contiguous, and contained both in one superior's charter, having been purchased in by one person, it was argued, That this naturally made an union, so as to be in the power of the purchaser, by giving infeftment in any one spot, to make it extend over both tenements; which was repelled, in respect, that though the tenements lying contiguous were naturally united in the superior's person, who possessed them both by one title, it was not so with the vassal, who possessing them by distinct titles, derived from different authors, as to him they were no more united than if lying from one another at the greatest distance.—See Appendix.
