Alison v Ritchie. [1730] Mor 15196 (3 February 1730)

BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Alison v Ritchie. [1730] Mor 15196 (3 February 1730)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1730/Mor3515196-061.html
Cite as: [1730] Mor 15196

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1730] Mor 15196

Subject_1 TACK.
Subject_2 SECT. III.
Ish. - Indefinite Endurance, how limited?

Alison
v.
Ritchie

Date: 3 February 1730
Case No. No. 61.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A tack being let for an elusory tack-duty, and for an endurance of 2400 years, was found not to have the benefit of the act of Parliament in favour of tenants, and therefore not good against singular successors. See Appendix
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 419.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1730/Mor3515196-061.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Alison v Ritchie. [1730] Mor 15196 (3 February 1730) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1730/Mor3515196-061.html Cite as: [1730] Mor 15196