BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Craig v Grant. [1732] Mor 8955 (5 July 1732) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1732/Mor218955-067.html Cite as: [1732] Mor 8955 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1732] Mor 8955
Subject_1 MINOR.
Subject_2 SECT. III. What a Minor can do without Consent of Curators.
Date: Craig
v.
Grant
5 July 1732
Case No.No 67.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A Bill, granted by a minor, safe from the exception of minority and lesion because he was a trading merchant at the time, was challenged as null, being without consent of the minor's father, administrator-in-law. Answered, That, if the minor's being a trading merchant is sufficient to presume it a reasonable act, so as to defeat the exception of lesion, it must, of course, also defeat the nullity arising from want of the administrator's consent; for deeds done by minors, without consent of curators, are effectual, if rational and prudent, as well
as where they are in rem versum of the minor.—The Lords repelled the de fence.—See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting