BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Brymer v Graham. [1734] Mor 10004 (5 December 1734) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1734/Mor2410004-022.html Cite as: [1734] Mor 10004 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1734] Mor 10004
Subject_1 PAYMENT.
Date: Brymer
v.
Graham
5 December 1734
Case No.No 22.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A real creditor upon a bankrupt estate, who was also cautioner for the factor, having conveyed his debt to a creditor of his own for his security and payment; the question arose, If the assignee could draw this, debt out of the bankrupt estate or price thereof, without being chargeable for the balance due by the factor, who was now become bankrupt, as well, as his cautioner the cedent. In this case there could be no place for compensation; for, esto the balance due by the factor had been liquid, the cautioner was creditor upon the estate, but had no claim against the co-creditors, neither was he debtor to them for the factor's intromissions, but to the Court of Session; neither could payment or extinction be pleaded, because a factor has no power to apply his intromissions towards payment of his own debt, and far less has his cautioner power to apply the factor's intromissions; the Lords therefore found, That the onerous assignee was not liable to account for the factor's intromissions, and repelled the objection pleaded against him upon that head.——In a former case, the Lords had sustained the objection against the onerous assignee, 3d January 1730, Oliphant against Morisons.—See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting