BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Tailfer v Hamilton of Grange. [1735] Mor 17032 (21 January 1735) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1735/Mor3817032-319.html Cite as: [1735] Mor 17032 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1735] Mor 17032
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. XI. Writs defective in Solemnities, Whether capable of Support, so as to furnish Action?
Date: Tailfer
v.
Hamilton of Grange
21 January 1735
Case No.No. 319.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A decree-arbitral being challenged in a reduction, because the submission on which it proceeded was null by act 1681, there being only one witness to the subscription of one of the parties; the defence was, That the submission was homologated by the parties appearing and pleading before the arbiters. Answered, This may give it the effect of a verbal submission, which by law is reducible upon iniquity, but cannot make a null writ valid. Replied, A writ though defective upon the act 1681, is not ipso jure null; it has an effect in law as being sufficient to found a process; it is elidable indeed by exception, but if the party do not chuse to move his exception, it is not pars judicis to take notice of it; and the acts of homologation mentioned, are sufficient to bar the party personali objectione from moving his exception; the Lords sustained the defence of homologation. See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting