BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mercer v Irvine. [1736] 1 Elchies 336 (31 January 1736)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1736/Elchies010336-006.html
Cite as: [1736] 1 Elchies 336

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1736] 1 Elchies 336      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.

Mercer
v.
Irvine

1736, Jan. 31.
Case No. No. 6.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Lords unanimously sustained the tutrix's defence upon the prescription of tutors' accounts, 20th January. 31st January The Lords unanimously adhered without answers;—and most of us were of opinion that even protutors and procurators accounts fall under the act of prescription. Vide act of sederunt anent protutors, &c.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1736/Elchies010336-006.html