BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Carruthers of Holmains v Johnston of Persbiehall. [1737] 2 Elchies 287 (17 June 1737) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1737/Elchies020287-002.html Cite as: [1737] 2 Elchies 287 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1737] 2 Elchies 287
Subject_1 IRRITANCY.
Date: Carruthers of Holmains
v.
Johnston of Persbiehall
17 June 1737
Case No.No. 2.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Irritancy of a feu ob non solutum canonem, where the irritancy was, “if twelve terms feu-duty should run together unpaid:” The defender produced several instruments at different terms, bearing offer of the feu-duty, but so defective that they could not be regarded: But the superior, after all these instruments, having written to the vassal dispensing with his making a tender of the feu-duty at that term, and offering to enter him on certain terms;—that was thought to be an acknowledging him as vassal, and dispensing with the defects of the former tenders;—and therefore the Lords found the irritancy not incurred. (See Dict. No. 67. p. 7235.)
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting