BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Campbells v Campbells. [1738] Mor 3195 (16 December 1738)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1738/Mor0803195-014.html
Cite as: [1738] Mor 3195

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1738] Mor 3195      

Subject_1 DEATH-BED.
Subject_2 SECT. II.

Whether Competent to Heirs of Provision.

Campbells
v.
Campbells

Date: 16 December 1738
Case No. No 14.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

One having become bound in his contract of marriage to provide a certain sum, and also the conquest during the marriage, to himself and spouse in conjunct-fee, and to the children to be procreate of the marriage in fee, did purchase an estate during the marriage, taking the rights thereof to himself, his heirs and assignees, and upon death-bed did execute a deed, settling both heritable and moveable estate upon his eldest son, with the burden of certain provisions, in favour of the younger children; in a reduction of this settlement, at the instance of the younger children, upon the head of death-bed, the Lords were unanimous, that seeing there was no actual settlement of the conquest in terms of this obligation, to constitute the children heirs of provision, they had not the privilege of death-bed; that they were constituted creditors by this obligation, and in whatever way a service in general as heir of provision or conquest may have crept into our practice, it is, strictly speaking, inept; such a thing, while the father is alive, cannot be, and if he died without implementing, the obligation is purified in favour of the children, and they have a direct action against their father's representatives to make over the conquest in their favour. See Appendix.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 211.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1738/Mor0803195-014.html