BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Boyes v John Ogilvie. [1739] 5 Brn 209 (2 February 1739) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Brn050209-0199.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by LORD KILKERRAN, ADVOCATE.
Date: Thomas Boyes
v.
John Ogilvie
2 February 1739 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This case is reported by Elchies, (Cautioner, No. 7.) where the circumstances are stated. Lord Kilkerran's note is as follows:—
“The general point of jus superveniens accrescit would per se not have been sufficient to support the interlocutor; for notwithstanding of such accretion, as between buyer and seller, yet still the separate right being duly affected by a creditor, would remain with that creditor, in competition with the purchaser, though this was not the subject of any argument at this time, the Lords being all clear
on the second ground, that the creditor is bound to assign all separate securities to the cautioner, not ex equitate only, but de jure, and that, if he have aliened such securities to a third party, he cannot thereafter be heard to quarrel the validity of such securities which he himself has conveyed.”
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
