BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Purdie v Lord Torpichen. [1739] Mor 14334 (9 November 1739)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Mor3314334-030.html
Cite as: [1739] Mor 14334

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1739] Mor 14334      

Subject_1 SASINE.
Subject_2 SECT. VII.

Infeftment on a Personal Right. - Sasine on a Precept of clare constat. - Infeftment in a Right of Annual-rent, taken on a Precept in a disposition of the Property.

Purdie
v.
Lord Torpichen

Date: 9 November 1739
Case No. No. 30.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The exception of precepts of clare constat in the 35th act of the parliament 1693, was found to be absolute, and that such precepts became ineffectual, not only where the receiver, but also where the granter died before taking sasine thereon, though still such precept or sasine was understood to be a title of prescription. But when the obtainer of a precept of clare constat, who had taken his sasine after the superior the granter's death, had conveyed the lands to a singular successor, who had obtained from the succeeding superior many years thereafter a confirmation of all rights, titles, and securities, in respect the obtainer of the said precept of clare was then in life, although the confirmation was only in the foresaid general terms, the same was found to be effectual to the purchaser, and not challengeable by the heir of the ancient vassal, predecessor of the obtainer of the said precept. This confirmation was considered as of the same effect as if the superior had renewed the precept of clare to the obtainer of the former, though it did not appear whether or not he knew that he was then in life.

Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 264. Kilkerran.

*** This case is No. 87. p. 10796. voce Prescription.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1739/Mor3314334-030.html