BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Blackwood of Pitreavie v the Earl of Sutherland, and the Representatives of Colvil and Russel. [1740] Mor 14140 (7 November 1740) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1740/Mor3214140-040.html Cite as: [1740] Mor 14140 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1740] Mor 14140
Subject_1 RIGHT in SECURITY.
Subject_2 SECT. XI. Effect of a joint-disposition to several Persons for security of Debt.
Date: Blackwood of Pitreavie
v.
the Earl of Sutherland, and the Representatives of Colvil and Russel
7 November 1740
Case No.No 40.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Where a joint-disposition of property is granted to several persons, the disponees have no concern with one another; and there can be no competition between them, nor any action, but for a division. But where a joint-disposition is granted to several persons for security of debts, the security granted to each creditor is over the whole subject; they have a joint-interest, and the excluding of one of them on an objection to his debt, or any other ground, augments the security of the rest.
Upon this ground, in a competition between an adjudger from the common debtor, and certain joint-disponees in security, for the share of one of the joint-disponees, whose infeftment was found void, as proceeding on a precept for infefting the Representatives of Colvil, without naming or describing those representatives, the other disponees were preferred.
*** Clerk Homes report of this case is No 23. p. 6902., voce Infeftment.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting