BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Kenzie v Buchanan. [1741] 1 Elchies 319 (11 February 1741) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1741/Elchies010319-006.html Cite as: [1741] 1 Elchies 319 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1741] 1 Elchies 319
Subject_1 PASSIVE TITLE.
M'Kenzie
v.
Buchanan
1741 ,Feb. Dec. 11 .
Case No.No. 6.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
We were unanimous that there was no gestio pro harede at common law; and further found that Sandside having an adjudication in 1681, and purchased further rights in 1698 and 1699, and possessed upon these rights, that although his eldest son was then apparent-heir of William Buchanan of Sound, and supposing that this defender were now apparent-heir of them also, yet that the defender is not in the case of the act 1695.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
