BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Watson v Rose. [1741] 1 Elchies 348 (3 July 1741) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1741/Elchies010348-012.html Cite as: [1741] 1 Elchies 348 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1741] 1 Elchies 348
Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Watson
v.
Rose
1741 ,July 3 .
Case No.No. 12.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Watson pursuing Rose for six years wages; alleged none were due because none agreed for; that the pursuer was sent to the defender by his the defender's brother for his education as a servant; that he clothed and educated him, and made him a supernumerary waiter, and he made great profits in the defender's service. Answered, Wages due without paction, the pursuer having before been a servant to the defender's brother for wages, 20 merks. Replied, The pursuer's wages, what he got from the defender's brother, were not bear equal to the clothes the defender gave him, besides his education and other profits. The Ordinary's interlocutor had found no wages due, and the Lords adhered and refused a bill without answers.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
