BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir Robert Monro v M'Kenzie, &c. - Ross-shire. [1745] 1 Elchies 268 (30 July 1745) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1745/Elchies010268-042.html Cite as: [1745] 1 Elchies 268 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1745] 1 Elchies 268
Subject_1 MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.
Sir Robert Monro
v.
M'Kenzie, &c - Ross-shire.
1745 ,July 30 .
Case No.No. 42.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The first question was, Whether vassals of the Earldom of Ross, and Lordships of Ardmenach, could vote because of the act of James III. and James VI.; and 2dly, that some of them formerly held of the family of Seaforth; and both superior and vassal were forfeited; and though the vassals purchased their own predecessors estates, yet they did not purchase their superiors estate? We repelled the objection, both because the act of Parliament did not upon the existence of a second son eo ipso vest the right in him, and because the respondents were infeft, and in possession held of the Crown, in terms of the act 1681.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
