BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mercer v Scotland. [1745] Mor 9884 (6 June 1745) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1745/Mor2309884-214.html Cite as: [1745] Mor 9884 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1745] Mor 9884
Subject_1 PASSIVE TITLE.
Subject_2 DIVISION V. Accepting a Disposition with the Burden of Debts.
Date: Mercer
v.
Scotland
6 June 1745
Case No.No 214.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A person, passing by his brother and heir at law, disponed to his sister, and her heirs, all debts owing to him, heritable and moveable, and all his estate, goods, and gear, which should belong to him at the time of his death; with this proviso, That the right, and every person who should claim thereby, should be burdened with the payment of all his just and lawful debts; and he reserved a power to alter at any time in his life. After the death of the disponee, an
only son of the sister having served himself heir of provision in general, it came to be questioned between him and a creditor of the disponer, Whether or not he was universally liable upon the clause burdening him with payment of the disponer's debts? It was admitted, that such burdens in dispositions to particular subjects were understood as only intended for the security of creditors; but it was argued, That the acceptance of a man's whole estate under a general conveyance, must infer an universal passive title. The Lords found, That as the defender was not alioqui successurus, he was not universally liable, but tantum in valorem of the subjects disponed. *** This case is No 119. p. 9786.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting