BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Case from Aberdeenshire. [1746] 1 Elchies 269 (19 June 1746) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1746/Elchies010269-045.html Cite as: [1746] 1 Elchies 269 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1746] 1 Elchies 269
Subject_1 MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.
Case from Aberdeenshire
1746 ,June 19 .
Case No.No. 45.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In this case of Thomas Burnet of Criggie, to whom his father disponed an estate on which he was infeft, held of the Crown, and immediately disponed it back to his father, to be held blench of himself, the Lords repelled the objection, six to five. Pro were, Justice-Clerk, Strichen, Kilkerran, Monzie, Murkle, Leven. Con. were, Drummore, Haining, Dunn, Tinwald, et ego, and the President seemed to be of our opinion. 19th June 1746 Altered, and sustained the objection. Vide that date, (as follows:)
A reclaiming bill was advised against our interlocutor, marked 30th July last, in the case of Thomas Burnet of Criggie, which we altered, and sustained the objection against his vote. For this last interlocutor were, President, Drummore, Haining, Dun, Monzie, Tinwald, et ego. Con. was, Minto. Strichen would not vote. All the rest absent.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
