BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Walter Ruddiman v Trades Maiden Hospital. [1746] 2 Elchies 461 (30 June 1946) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1746/Elchies020461-028.html Cite as: [1746] 2 Elchies 461 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1746] 2 Elchies 461
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Date: Walter Ruddiman
v.
Trades Maiden Hospital
30 June 1946
Case No.No. 28.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A reduction, on the act 1621, was within these two or three years pursued of a mortification to the Maiden Hospital, in the name of the executors of Thomas Smith, upon a bond dated in 1689, and never heard of since that time, assigned in 1695 to a blank person, the bond registrated in 1703, but the assignation not registrated till 1733, about 44 years after the date of the bond, and then the blank filled up with a hand different from the writer of the deed, in the name of Thomas Smith, the cedent's grand-child, (then a child of seven or eight years of age.) The defence therefore being, that the bond was prescribed, the reply was, the assignee's minority, which was proved, so that it came to the question when this blank is presumed to have been filled up and delivered;—and notwithstanding several other very suspicious circumstances, the Lords found it filled up and delivered of the date.—Adhered. (See Dict. No. 355. p. 11155.)
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting