BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Gillespie v Main. [1747] Mor 2163 (26 June 1747)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Mor0502163-086.html
Cite as: [1747] Mor 2163

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1747] Mor 2163      

Subject_1 CAUTIONER.
Subject_2 SECT. IX.

Attester of a Cautioner in Suspension.

Gillespie
v.
Main

Date: 26 June 1747
Case No. No 86.

An attester of a cautioner in a suspension may be summarily charged with horning upon his obligation.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

John Gillespie drover in Abington, having obtained decreet before the Sheriff of Edinburgh, against John Croll flesher there; it was suspended, and George Lesly indweller in Edinburgh became cautioner, who was attested by Andrew Main taylor there, in these words, being the ordinary style of attestations, “I do hereby not only attest the sufficiency of the within designed cautioner, but likewise bind and oblige me, my heirs, and executors, as cautioners for him, and for payment of the within sums of money, as fully in all respects as the cautioner himself, except as to the order of discussing; and consent thir presents be registrate with the within bond, that all execution pass thereon subsidiarie accordingly.”

A bill of horning was presented against the attester, upon production of a registrate horning and denunciation against the suspender and cautioner; and the matter being reported, because the writers to the signet doubted whether an attester could be summarily charged with horning, they thinking that he was only liable to a process.

The Lords directed the Lord Ordinary to pass the bill.

Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 122. D. Falconer, v. 1. No 194. p. 259.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Mor0502163-086.html