BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> King's College of Aberdeen v The Heritors of Old Macher. [1748] 1 Elchies 255 (29 June 1748) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1748/Elchies010255-002.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 MANSE.
King's College of Aberdeen
v.
The Heritors of Old Macher
1748 ,June 29 .
Case No.No. 2.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Presbytery having assessed the heritors in above L.990 for repairing the Minister's manse, the heritors suspended for that the manse was the Dean's house, and the Deanry being disponed to the College, who were to supply the charge, neither this manse, nor any house of any dignified Clergyman fell under the act 1663; 2dly, That in 1680 the heritors paid the College L.1000 for this house to the Minister, and after that time repaired it sufficiently, and the Ministers were bound to uphold it during their incumbancies, and the College during the vacancy; that upon Principal Chalmer's death in 1746 it was found worth L.1644, and the 12th November thereafter when the new Minister was placed, it was by the Presbytery found worth L.1640, that is only L.4 worse during the vacancy, which the College paid, and yet immediately thereafter it was found to need L.903 to repair it, and with the Collector's salary making L.998. The Court thought the houses of dignified Clergy did not fall under the act 1663, but now that this is become a stipendiary Minister that his house did fall under it. They were dissatisfied with the Presbytery's manner of taking trial how the house had been upheld by the last incumbent or during the vacancy by taking reports, not what repairs the houses wanted, but what it was worth. But it appearing that the decay of the house was owing to the side walls giving way so as to be out of the plumb, and that occasioned by a crevice in the gable, the risque whereof the heritors took upon them at the last reparation, therefore they found the heritors liable; but that they might either repair the old house or build a new one worth L.1000, and, if they chose the last, ordered them to give in to Court a plan of such new house.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting