BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
The Earl of Panmuir v James Morgan. [1751] Mor 15340 (5 February 1751)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1751/Mor3515340-235.html Cite as:
[1751] Mor 15340
Tacksmen cannot free subtenants from services due for their possessions to third parties.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Margaret Countess of Panmuir obtained a tack, 24th April, 1724, from the York-Buildings Company, of the manor-place of Panmuir, with the services payable by the seven cottars of Guildie, being the old town of Panmuir, and the nine pendiclers of the new town of Panmuir; the right to which tack came into the person of William Earl of Panmuir.
Garden of Troup, in 1728, obtained a tack of part of the estate, including the cot-town and new town, with exception from the warrandice of the services and carriages payable by the possessors of these towns; and, 30th December, 1747, subset the lands of Balhill, belonging to the new town, to James Morgan, who, besides his rent, became bound to “perform such services, vicarage, local bolls, multure, knaveship, or other dues whatever, payable to minister, schoolmaster, kirk, mill, ground-officer, and smith, or others, as the lands set had heretofore been in use of.”
The Earl of Panmuir obtained decreet against Morgan, before the Sheriff of Forfar, for service of carriage used to be performed for his possession to the manor-place; and a bill of suspension was refused by the Lord Ordinary.
Pleaded, in a reclaiming bill: By an act 20. Geo. II. tenants are liable for no further services than are expressed in their tacks.
Answered: Setters of tacks cannot free their tenants from services due for their possessions to third parties.
The Lords adhered.
Act. H. Home.Alt. T. Hay.Clerk, Kirkpatrick.
D. Falconer, v. 2. No. 191. p. 229.
