BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir Robert Gordon v Dunbar of Newton, [1753] 5 Brn 807 (10 December 1753) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1753/Brn050807-0980.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. Collected By James Burnett,Lord Monoboddo.
Date: Sir Robert Gordon
v.
Dunbar of Newton,
10 December 1753 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In this case, the Lords found that it was a good defence against a plea of immemorial possession, to say that the possession had been interrupted, and that the possessor had been out of his possession for years together; because, as Lord Elchies said, though a single act of interruption would not take away the benefit of immemorial possession, however it might interrupt prescription, yet if the party so far gave up his right as to relinquish his possession for years together, he loses the benefit of immemorial possession, though he afterwards begin to possess again; for immemorial possession is a possession without discontinuance, past memory of man, from whence a right is presumed from the acquiescence of parties; but that presumption ceases if it appears that the party has at any time suffered himself to be turned out of possession.
This opinion was given in a question about a limestone quarry said to be acquired by immemorial possession.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
