BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Hopetoun v The Feuars of Bathgate. [1753] 2 Elchies 390 (21 November 1753) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1753/Elchies020390-012.html Cite as: [1753] 2 Elchies 390 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1753] 2 Elchies 390
Subject_1 MULTURES, (THIRALGE.*)
Date: Earl of Hopetoun
v.
The Feuars of Bathgate
21 November 1753
Case No.No. 12.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Earl of Hopetoun is infeft in the Barony of Bathgate, (which is part of the principality) and in the mill of the Barony with multures and sequels; and some of the brewers in the town having set up steel-mills, he pursued a declarator of astriction, and for suppressing the steel-mills; and proved that the feuars of houses and kail-yards in the town, who were also brewers, were in use of bringing all the malt to the mill, and paying intown multures; that the miller set apart one day in the week for grinding their malt, and that one carrier's horse was employed by all the brewers, and paid by them for carrying their malt; and proved also by parole evidence, the fining some of the inhabitants who bought ground malt without the thirl and brewed it within the thirl. The Lords declared unanimously in the astriction, and for suppressing the steel-mills, though the defenders proved their going sometimes to other mills in the open day, though not that the miller knew it, and though the defenders alleged that he had not proved 40 years possession against any one particular feuar.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting