BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Magistrates of Montrose v Scott of Rossie. [1755] Mor 4167 (7 February 1755) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1755/Mor1004167-002.html Cite as: [1755] Mor 4167 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1755] Mor 4167
Subject_1 FERRY-BOAT.
Date: Magistrates of Montrose
v.
Scott of Rossie
7 February 1755
Case No.No 2.
The proprietor of a ferryboat may, upon rational considerations, heighten the accustomed fare.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Scott of Rossie having a right to a ferry upon the river of South Esk, opposite to the town of Montrose, found it necessary, upon the increase of wheel-machines, and upon other rational considerations, to heighten the accustomed fare. And for that end he applied to the quarter sessions, and obtained their authority to exact the several sums contained in a table laid before them. A bill of suspension, offered for the Town of Montrose, being refused by the Ordinary, the matter was brought before the Court by petition, which, with the answers, being advised, the Court were pretty unanimous in the following points; 1mo, That the grant of a ferry implies a power of imposing a duty pro opere; 2do, That a ferry is a patrimonial right upon which moderate profits
may be made; 3tio, If exorbitant duties are laid on, they may be regulated by the justices, to whom the inspection of ferries, as well as of highways, is committed. ‘Upon the whole, the duties in this case were not reckoned exorbitant; and, therefore, the Court was of opinion, that the Ordinary did right in refusing the bill.’
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting