BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lord Monzie and Others [1758] 5 Brn 525 (22 January 1758) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1758/Brn050525-0567.html Cite as: [1758] 5 Brn 525 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Brn 525
Subject_1 DECISIONS of THE LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 NOBILE OFFICIUM.
v.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The case of Lord Monzie and Others, trustees appointed by Mr Campbell, minister at Weem, collected by Lord Kilkerran, p. 518, is a famous case, where the Court, ex nobili officio, interposed to prevent a settlement on trustees being evacuated by the death and failure of the quorum. See Principles of Equity, p. 53. This was a settlement for public pious uses. They did the same where the trustees refused to accept, with regard to a sum of money mortified by Mi-Gilbert Ramsay to the corporation of New Aberdeen, to be applied for burses to students of divinity in the College. This appears from the papers in the case of Campbell. And the Magistrates having refused to accept, the Lords appointed Sir Alexander Ramsay, to whom the defunct had given the presentation of the bursars, to manage and administrate the mortified sum, and name factors for uplifting the annualrents and apply them in terms of the will.
In Lady Cunningham's case, the two Trustees, Sir John Cunningham and Lady Dalrymple refused to accept, 22d January 1758. The settlement was irrational, and all concerned wished to have it away. The Lords were called by the settlement, on failure of the trustees. A challenge was brought in support of the deed, and, though only a mock-fight, the Lords, by their first interlocutor, found that the settlement had not fallen. But, on a reclaiming bill, they altered, and found that it had fallen.
See Principles of Equity, p. 54; also the case Campbells against Campbell, mentioned Principles of Equity, p. 55 and 122.
They seem to make a distinction between deeds for private and for public uses.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting