BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Barclay v Douglas. [1758] Mor 9624 (11 July 1758) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1758/Mor2309624-003.html Cite as: [1758] Mor 9624 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1758] Mor 9624
Subject_1 PARENT and CHILD.
Date: Barclay
v.
Douglas
11 July 1758
Case No.No 3.
A father liable to pay an account of furnishings to his son, tho' living separately from him, he minor, and not entered to any employment.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Robert Barclay, tailor in Edinburgh, sued Archibald Douglas of Dornock, for an account of tailor-furnishings made all at one time to his eldest son, amounting to L. 36.
The debt was contracted by Dornock's son, when eighteen years of age, without aliment or profession, and not living with his father, on account of some differences betwixt them; the debt was high, considering the circumstances of father and son; but for this the pursuer assigned, as the reason, that at the time of contracting it, the son's friends were soliciting a commission in the army for him.
“The Lords found the defender liable.”
Act. J. Craigie. Alt. Hew Dalrymple.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting