BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Lundin of Drums, v James Hamilton. [1758] Mor 13845 (19 December 1758) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1758/Mor3213845-086.html Cite as: [1758] Mor 13845 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1758] Mor 13845
Subject_1 REMOVING.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Warning, in what Cases necessary. - How to be executed.
Date: James Lundin of Drums,
v.
James Hamilton
19 December 1758
Case No.No 86.
Warning only necessary in removings from land, not from a house, though in the country.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The question which occurred betwixt these parties was, Whether a regular warning was necessary to be executed forty days before Whitsunday, previous to any process of removing, against a tacksman of a house in the country? or, Whether the act 1555, anent warnings, does not apply only to the possessors of lands?
See Craig, Lib 2. D. 9. § 18.; Stair, Title Tacks, § 38.; Sir George Mackenzie, Observ. on said act; Bankton, vol. 2. p. 110.; 21st November 1671, Riddel, No 67. p. 13828.
“The Lords unanimously found, that the act 1555 did not extend to houses in the country.”
Reporter, Lord Justice-Clerk. Act. D. Grume. Alt. Lockhart.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting