BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ninian Crawfurd, Boxmaster to the Trades in Saltcoats, v Samuel Mitchel, Shoemaker in Saltcoats. [1761] Mor 1958 (13 June 1761) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1761/Mor0501958-077.html Cite as: [1761] Mor 1958 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1761] Mor 1958
Subject_1 BURGH ROYAL.
Subject_2 SECT. V. The Privileges of Burghs and Burgesses. - Monopolies.
Date: Ninian Crawfurd, Boxmaster to the Trades in Saltcoats,
v.
Samuel Mitchel, Shoemaker in Saltcoats
13 June 1761
Case No.No 77.
Tradesmen forming themselves into societies, are not incorporations, and have no persona standi.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the year 1725, a number of tradesmen of different crafts in the town of Saltcoats, which is a burgh of barony, entered into an agreement, by which they associated and incorporated themselves together. They resolved to have a stock-purse. They created a deacon or boxmaster, and appointed one to be chosen yearly: They obliged themselves to meet quarterly, and that any person who should fail to attend any meeting should be fined sixpence: They determined, that certain sums should be paid into the box by every member at each quarterly meeting; and that every one who entered apprentice should also be obliged to pay a certain sum to the box; and they enacted, that any person who should come from another parish and dwell in the town of Saltcoats, should be obliged to subscribe to the association, and pay a certain sum into the box. And the agreement bore, that the subscribers were witnesses to one another's subscriptions.
This agreement was approved of by the Earl of Eglinton, the superior of the town.
In the year 1740, Samuel Mitchel settled at Saltcoats, and subscribed the agreement: Some years after he refused to attend the meetings, or to pay the usual contributions; upon which a process was brought against him before the baron-bailie of Saltcoats, at the instance of Ninian Crawfurd, as boxmaster to the trades of Saltcoats, in order to oblige him to pay, 1mo, the arrears of his quarterly payments; 2do, Fines for his absence at sundry meetings of the trades; and, 3tio, The dues payable for an apprentice and journeyman.
The baron-bailie pronounced decreet against Mitchel; upon which the matter came before the Court of Session by suspension, in which the suspender principally insisted, that this was no legal corporation; and consequently their box master had no title to pursue in their name.
Pleaded for the charger, That a contract, entered into for lawful purposes, with the consent of the superior, is certainly binding; and although the trades of Saltcoats cannot properly be called a legal corporation, as being destitute of the authority of King or Parliament; yet it cannot be disputed, that private persons may enter into a society for lawful purposes without any such authority: That this society was not only lawful, but had been highly useful, as, by means of it, trade had been improved, and the poor supported in various instances.
The suspender having signed the agreement, is obliged to fulfil it; and every partner of a society is entitled to pursue any other of the partners for implement of the obligation he has come under. The charger therefore is entitled to insist in his own name; and his title is surely not the worse that he is authorised by the rest as boxmaster to pursue in their name, as well as his own.
Pleaded for the suspender: All such societies as this, entered into without public authority, are held to be unlawful combinations; from which it follows, that the trades of Saltcoats can claim none of the privileges enjoyed by corporations; that they have not persona standi in judicio; nor can their boxmaster sue in their name.
That the present action is carried on by Crawfurd solely as boxmaster, and not tanquam privatus, appears from the libel.
2do, Et separatim, it was pleaded, That whatever effect this bond might be supposed to have quoad the original subscribers; yet it is not binding upon the defender, in respect it is not a valid deed, as wanting both the date of his subscription, and the names and designations of witnesses thereto, which are essential requisites to all written obligations.
‘The Lords suspended the letters simpliciter.’ See Society.
Reporter, Lord Aucbinleck. Act. Nairn. Alt. W. Wallace, junior. Clerk, Kirkpatrick.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting