BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Eleonora Mutter v The Magistrates of Linlithgow. [1761] Mor 2542 (6 March 1761)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1761/Mor0602542-036.html Cite as:
[1761] Mor 2542
Powers of a Box-master. - Liability of Interim Magitrates.
Eleonora Mutter v. The Magistrates of Linlithgow
Date: 6 March 1761 Case No. No 36.
Interim Magistrates were found liable for the escape of a prisoner. Action of relief was reserved to those who were not guilty, against those who were guilty.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
On a double election of Magistrates in the burgh of Linlithgow, both were reduced by a sentence of the Court of Session; and for some years the burgh remained without a legal magistracy.
During this interval, a prisoner for civil debt in the tolbooth of the burgh had presented a petition to the Court of Session, setting forth, That he was destitute of subsistence, and that there were no Magistrates in the place to whom he could apply for an aliment; and therefore praying, that the Court would appoint certain persons named in the petition to execute the powers of the act 1696, commonly called the Act of Grace, ay and until a legal magistracy should be established in the burgh. Upon which petition, the Court, on the 11th of December 1755, pronounced the following deliverance: ‘Having heard this petition, they authorise and appoint Thomas Smith writer, Robert Clark, and Henry Gillies, merchants, and Robert Jamieson writer, who were Bailies of the burgh of Linlithgow preceding Michaelmas 1754, or any of them, to act as Bailie of the said burgh ad hunc effectum to modify an aliment, and execute the other powers committed to the Magistrates of royal burghs by the act 1696; and to continue in the exercise of the said office, ay and while a legal magistracy shall be chosen,’ &c.
Eleonora Mutter soon after imprisoned John Ferrier, her debtor, in that tolbooth. The Magistrates received him, imprisoned him, decerned an aliment for him; but, after some weeks, unwarrantably discharged him; after which he continued in the town.
In discharging the prisoner, Gillies and Clark had no active hand.
Eleonora Mutter pursued the Magistrates for the debt.
Pleaded for the Magistrates; This is a penal action to make them liable for Ferrier's debt. All penal actions are strictly to be interpreted. Now, the Magistrates were appointed by the Court ad hunc effectum only, to execute the powers committed to the Magistrates of royal burghs by the act 1696. They are subject to all the consequences of the abuse of these powers, but not to any other consequences relating to the powers of Magistrates; for, except quoad the powers contained in the act of Parliament 1696, they are not Magistrates. The present action is not competent against them in strict law, as they were not properly Magistrates, and ought not by interpretation to be extended against them, as it is of a penal nature.
Separately it was pleaded for Gillies and Clark, That as they had no active hand in discharging the prisoner, Jamieson and Smith only ought to be found liable.
The Lords found ‘all the defenders liable conjunctly and severally for the debt, reserving action of relief to Henry Gillies and Robert Clark against William Jamieson and Thomas Smith, as accords.’ See Prisoner.
Act. Millar, J. Dalrymple.Alt. Lockhart, Montgomery.Clerk, Gibson.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 142. Fac. Col. No 30. p. 58.
