BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Hew M'Kaill v Brown of Greenback. [1761] Mor 5298 (30 June 1761)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1761/Mor1305298-044.html Cite as:
[1761] Mor 5298
Privilege of selling the predecessor s estate by a public auctions.
Hew M'Kaill v. Brown of Greenback
Date: 30 June 1761 Case No. No 44.
The expense of a sale by an heir apparent, upon the act 1695, must be paid out of the subject.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A sale by an heir apparent upon the act 1695, was opposed by the only creditor who appeared, and whose debt amounted to a greater sum than could reasonably be expected for the subject. And for him it was urged, That if the pursuer, contrary to the interest of the creditor, was resolved to prosecute the sale, he should have no claim for the expense of the process, in case the price proved not sufficient to pay the debt. This point being reported to the Court, it was found, that the expense of the process must be paid out of the subject.
This judgment is not founded on the statute, which mentions nothing of expenses. Neither can the claim of expense be drawn as an inference from the statute; because the privilege is given to the heir apparent for his own sake, and not for the sake of the creditors. As little is the claim founded in equity; for the creditor here was not benefited, and esto he had been benefited, no man is bound to pay for a benefit he receives against his will.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 259. Sel. Dec. No 182. p. 248.*** This case is reported in the Faculty Collection:
M'Kaill brought a process of sale of an estate belonging to his mother, as apparent heir. Brown, one of the creditors, opposed the sale, and pleaded, That the estate was totally bankrupt, and that, if the pursuer insisted in his process, it must be at his own expense.
Answered for M'Kail; That supposing the estate to be bankrupt, a sale at the instance of an apparent heir can be carried on more easily, and at less expense, than one at the instance of creditors: That the act 1695 is general, allowing apparent heirs to bring their predecessor's estates to sale, and by universal practice, they are always allowed their expenses out of the price.
The Lords repelled the objection; and found, that the expenses of the sale must be defrayed out of the subject.
For M'Kaill, Geo. Wallace.Clerk, Gibson.
Fac. Col. No 46. p. 99.
