BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Nicolson v Millar, Glazier. [1764] 5 Brn 401 (00 January 1764) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1764/Brn050401-0352.html Cite as: [1764] 5 Brn 401 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1764] 5 Brn 401
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 BURGH ELECTIONS.
Nicolson
v.
Millar, Glazier
1764 .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Millar, a burgess of Edinburgh, and freeman glazier, member of Mary's Chapel, had his residence at the head of the Canongate, without the limits of the Royalty. He had, for a course of years, practised his trade in Edinburgh, paid the entries, quarterly dues, &c. as any other member of the incorporation, entered his apprentices, voted in all elections, and been in the long leet for deacon. He was elected deacon, anno 1763; and being objected to on account of non-residence, the Magistrates, judges in the first instance, and afterwards the Lords, sustained the objection, and preferred his competitor Nicolson, though elected by a confessed minority. It is to be observed, that, at the time of election, Millar was not only a resident in Canongate, but deacon of a corporation there, kirk-treasurer, stent-master, and constable.
A like case was given 1774, in the case of Brechin. In this case the Lords disallowed of the votes of all those who were not residenters within the burgh, though several of them resided close by it, in a village a few yards only from it, without the royalty, but had been in use to practise within the burgh without challenge.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
