BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Archibald Campbell v James Yates. [1765] Mor 12162 (13 November 1765)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1765/Mor2812162-299.html
Cite as: [1765] Mor 12162

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1765] Mor 12162      

Subject_1 PROCESS.
Subject_2 SECT. XII.

Judicial Steps, how far under the Power of Parties, to be retracted, altered, or amended.

Archibald Campbell
v.
James Yates

Date: 13 November 1765
Case No. No 299.

Whether prescription may be pleaded after litiscontestation?


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action for the price of a quantity of porter, the defender allowed decree to go in absence before the Sheriff. The charge having been suspended, and the furnishing denied, a proof was led, in which two witnesses deponed to the furnishing, and that it was stated in the charger's books accordingly.

Pleaded for the suspender; The accompt is prescribed quoad modum probandi, and it is incumbent upon the charger to prove resting owing, by writing or oath.

Answered; The triennial prescription does not operate ipso jure. It only affords an exception, which ought to have been pleaded before the Sheriff; or at least, stated in the suspension, before the proof was taken.

2do, The suspender does not plead payment, but denies the delivery, a defence inconsistent with payment. And, however a proof of resting owing might have been incompetent by parole evidence, the delivery may be proved in that manner. Accordingly, it has been so proved, and resting owing must be implied from the denial of delivery; for the suspender cannot be allowed to allege payment of articles, which he has affirmed were never delivered.

“The Lords found the articles sufficiently proved by the testimonies of the witnesses, referring to the charger's books.”

Act. Lockhart. Alt. Crosbie. Fac. Col. No 16. p. 226.

*** The Title Process is continued in Vol. XXIX.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1765/Mor2812162-299.html