BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Magistrates of Ruglen v Cullen. [1774] 5 Brn 439 (19 January 1774) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1774/Brn050439-0421.html Cite as: [1774] 5 Brn 439 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1774] 5 Brn 439
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 EXPENSES.
Date: Magistrates of Ruglen
v.
Cullen
19 January 1774 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
When the Lords give expenses of process, they always, in course, give the expense of extract. The clerk puts it into the interlocutor often without special authority. Upon the same footing it is, that, where, in an appeal, the House of Peers give costs, the Lords, when they apply the decree, give also the expense of the extract; 30th November 1773,—adhered to 19th January 1774. There were many other points. See this case under head of Appeal, p.
Query, Is this the practice in inferior courts? Why should it not?
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
